BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. — Actress Winona Ryder was convicted
Wednesday of stealing $5,500 worth of high-fashion merchandise from
Saks Fifth Avenue last year.
The jury found the star of “Girl, Interrupted” guilty of
felony grand theft and vandalism but cleared her of burglary.
She faces anywhere from probation to three years in prison.
Sentencing is scheduled for Dec. 6.
Ryder showed no emotion as the verdict was announced. She kept
her eyes on the jurors as they were asked whether the verdicts were
accurate. They said yes.
She whispered to her attorney, Mark Geragos, took a drink of
water and looked briefly toward her supporters in the audience.
The jury reached the verdict after 5 1/2 hours of deliberations
over two days. The one count on which she was acquitted required a
specific intent to go into the store to steal. District attorney’s
spokeswoman Sandi Gibbons said jurors often believe burglary is a
crime of breaking and entering, but it does not require those
circumstances.
“We’re gratified with the verdicts,” Gibbons added.
Ryder, a two-time Oscar nominee who marked her 31st birthday in
the defendant’s chair, was arrested Dec. 12 as she left the Beverly
Hills store, her arms filled with packages.
Ryder did not testify during the two-week trial.
Prosecutors said Ryder came to Saks with larceny on her mind,
bringing shopping bags, a garment bag and scissors to snip security
tags off items.
“She came, she stole, she left. End of story,” Deputy District
Attorney Ann Rundle said. “Nowhere does it say people steal
because they have to. People steal out of greed, envy, spite,
because it’s there or for the thrill.”
Jurors were shown videotape of Ryder moving through the store
laden with goods, and Saks security workers testified that after
she was detained she apologetically told them a director had told
her to shoplift to prepare for a movie role.
Her attorney denounced the security guards as liars even before
the trial began.
At the start of her shopping trip, she paid more than $3,000 for
a jacket and two blouses. The defense said Ryder believed the store
would keep her account “open” while she shopped and would charge
her later. But there was no evidence of an account.
In closing arguments Monday, Geragos suggested that the store,
trying to avoid a lawsuit, conspired with employees to invent a
story that would make Ryder appear guilty.
Geragos ridiculed the charge that Ryder vandalized merchandise
by cutting holes in clothes when removing the security tags.
“This woman is known for her fashion sense,” he said. “Was
she going to start a new line of ’Winona wear’ with holes in it?”
He carried a hair bow, which she allegedly had stolen, over to
her, placed it on her head and said: “Can anyone see Ms. Ryder
with this on top of her head? Does that make sense?”
Settlement talks between the defense and prosecution failed, but
just before trial the district attorney’s office agreed to dismiss
a drug charge after a doctor said he had given her two pills found
in her possession when she was arrested.
The 12-member jury included several people with Hollywood
connections, including producer Peter Guber, who presided over Sony
Entertainment Pictures when three successful Ryder films were made
there.
Ryder has made some two-dozen films since 1986, including
“Beetlejuice,” “Heathers,” “Mermaids,” “Little Women,”
“The Age of Innocence,” “Edward Scissorhands,” “Bram Stoker’s
Dracula,” “Reality Bites” and “Mr. Deeds.”
She received her Academy Award nominations for “Little Women”
(best actress) and for “The Age of Innocence” (supporting
actress).
Ryder was raised by parents who were part of the counterculture
revolution in the 1960s. Her godfather was LSD guru Timothy Leary.
In 1993, Ryder posted a $200,000 reward in the kidnap-murder
case of a 12-year-old girl, Polly Klaas, in Petaluma, Calif., where
the actress grew up. When Ryder was charged with shoplifting,
Polly’s father, Mark, came to legal proceedings to support her.
In recent years, Ryder has been featured frequently in fashion
magazines. Her delicate beauty and waiflike persona were on display
at the trial along with a wardrobe of appropriate trial clothes —
dark sweaters and skirts, soft dresses and, on the climactic day of
closing arguments, a cream silk suit with a pleated skirt and short
jacket.
Originally published on November 6, 2002